From Hype to Hard Decisions: Rethinking Approach to AI in Healthcare

AI is no longer a distant dream in healthcare – it’s a transformative force shaping the present. Innovations like transcribing notes in real time, detecting anomalies in scans, and simplifying authorizations with remarkable efficiency that once belonged to the realm of science fiction are now everyday realities. Yet with these breakthroughs come bigger, more complex questions:

Are we just adopting AI, or are we truly integrating it into how we deliver and manage care?

Are we chasing quick wins, or laying the groundwork for a smarter, more sustainable system?

As healthcare leaders, we’re being asked to move fast—but also to think long-term. This isn’t a manifesto of answers. It’s a reflection on the real trade-offs we face and the foundational choices that will shape whether AI becomes a patchwork of clever tools—or the connective tissue of an intelligent health system.

---

The Temptation of the Quick Win

Let’s be honest—when we come across a tool that could give our clinicians back even 20 minutes a day lost to the EHR, or automate a soul-crushing administrative task, it feels like a no-brainer.

These are real problems with real costs, and solving them matters—especially as burnout rates soar and teams feel increasingly stretched. Quick wins can be deeply valuable. But a new question is emerging across boardrooms and leadership circles:

Are we solving for today, while compromising tomorrow?

Every time we add another point solution, another login, another vendor, we risk building a new layer of complexity on top of already fragmented systems. What begins as tactical relief can evolve into a tangled mess of disconnected tools that don’t talk to each other or scale well.

---

Two Paths, Real Trade-offs

The decision to bring AI into healthcare organizations isn’t just technical—it’s strategic. And it often boils down to two distinct approaches: quick-fix apps versus a foundational AI platform. Each comes with its own risks, benefits, and long-term implications.

---

Playing the Long Game

At Azodha, we regularly connect with healthcare leaders and witness this tension unfolding firsthand. There’s undeniable appeal in fast, focused tools that solve an urgent need. But there’s a growing realization: what the industry truly needs isn’t just a series of solutions—it’s a solid, lasting foundation.

It’s like deciding between collecting flashy kitchen gadgets or investing in a thoughtful, well-integrated kitchen design. The gadgets may be satisfying at the moment, but it’s the integrated kitchen that makes the day-to-day work better, smoother, and more sustainable.

Laying the foundation for AI is similar. It’s about investing in robust data infrastructure, secure APIs, and governance frameworks. It’s about making it easier—not harder—to adopt smarter tools in the future. It’s not glamorous work, but it’s the kind of architecture that lets intelligence flow through every corner of the health system.

---

The Hard Questions on Our Minds

The journey ahead is not just about technology—it’s about leadership. And as we navigate this AI shift, here are the questions we’re asking ourselves, and inviting others to consider as well:

• The Point Solution Trap: How many 'quick wins' can we afford before the ecosystem becomes unmanageable? Are we unknowingly creating tech debt and risking disjointed care?
• Getting the Platform Right: If we choose to build a platform, what are the non-negotiables? What must we get right—from data models to identity management—to ensure it’s a long-term asset?
• Compliance Reality Check: As regulatory scrutiny increases, can we realistically manage risk, explainability, and bias across a sprawling vendor landscape?
• Beyond Tech: Driving Adoption: How do we move from tool deployment to true cultural adoption? What kind of change management will help our teams thrive, not just survive?
• Making the Data Flywheel Work: The promise of learning systems is compelling. But how do we securely connect and activate data to deliver compounding improvements?

Owning Our AI Future: What blend of technical, clinical, and governance expertise do we need internally to drive our AI vision with confidence and clarity?

---

We don’t believe these questions have easy answers—but we do believe they’re worth asking, out loud, with honesty. Because the way we answer them will shape how AI transforms care—not just in the next quarter, but for the next generation.

If you're wrestling with these same dilemmas, we’d love to connect and compare notes. Let’s keep the conversation real, grounded, and future focused.